Categories
Legal Issues

However, you do not need to do outside research – it is very possible to receive a high grade on the assignment based only on the assigned lectures and readings.

Nature of assignment: No aspect of modern civil litigation is more heavily criticized than the discovery process. We spent two modules exploring that process in federal court, basing our study on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and their applications. We have studied some recent reform proposals to the rules, as well as looking at a host of potential problems with discovery.
Please write a paper of between five and seven double-spaced pages. In your paper, describe and defend one or more reforms that you would propose in order to improve the discovery process in federal civil litigation. Make sure that you clearly identify the changes that you would make to the existing discovery process and explain why the changes that you identify would improve that process.
Your paper must propose one or more changes or reforms to the existing federal discovery process – you should not simply describe aspects of the system that are already in place.
Furthermore, you are free to write a paper about only one proposed reform, or you may write about more than one proposal. However, I recommend that you do not spread yourself too thin by trying to write about too many topics or problems. An approach that tries to cover too much ground will likely receive a lower grade because it will be unable to fully explain and defend the changes that are being proposed within the two to the three-single-spaced page limit.
In writing your paper, you are free to consult any outside material you wish, as well as any of the required or optional readings. However, you do not need to do outside research – it is very possible to receive a high grade on the assignment based only on the assigned lectures and readings.
Grading: Your grade will be based primarily on how well you describe and defend one or more reforms to the federal discovery process. I of course will not grade you based on whether or not I personally agree with your approach to discovery or the problems you are trying to solve. Nor does it matter whether you have picked the most “important” problems on which to work. So do not worry about whether you are picking the most “earth-shaking” issues with the discovery process.
Instead, I want to see thoughtful analyses that identify and defend clear reform proposals. A good answer will thus demonstrate an understanding of how discovery fits into the broader civil litigation process, as well as a solid grasp of how discovery works and what some of its weak points are.
Of course, the organization and clarity of your writing will also affect your grade.

Categories
Legal Issues

However, you do not need to do outside research – it is very possible to receive a high grade on the assignment based only on the assigned lectures and readings.

Nature of assignment: No aspect of modern civil litigation is more heavily criticized than the discovery process. We spent two modules exploring that process in federal court, basing our study on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and their applications. We have studied some recent reform proposals to the rules, as well as looking at a host of potential problems with discovery.
Please write a paper of between five and seven double-spaced pages. In your paper, describe and defend one or more reforms that you would propose in order to improve the discovery process in federal civil litigation. Make sure that you clearly identify the changes that you would make to the existing discovery process and explain why the changes that you identify would improve that process.
Your paper must propose one or more changes or reforms to the existing federal discovery process – you should not simply describe aspects of the system that are already in place.
Furthermore, you are free to write a paper about only one proposed reform, or you may write about more than one proposal. However, I recommend that you do not spread yourself too thin by trying to write about too many topics or problems. An approach that tries to cover too much ground will likely receive a lower grade because it will be unable to fully explain and defend the changes that are being proposed within the two to the three-single-spaced page limit.
In writing your paper, you are free to consult any outside material you wish, as well as any of the required or optional readings. However, you do not need to do outside research – it is very possible to receive a high grade on the assignment based only on the assigned lectures and readings.
Grading: Your grade will be based primarily on how well you describe and defend one or more reforms to the federal discovery process. I of course will not grade you based on whether or not I personally agree with your approach to discovery or the problems you are trying to solve. Nor does it matter whether you have picked the most “important” problems on which to work. So do not worry about whether you are picking the most “earth-shaking” issues with the discovery process.
Instead, I want to see thoughtful analyses that identify and defend clear reform proposals. A good answer will thus demonstrate an understanding of how discovery fits into the broader civil litigation process, as well as a solid grasp of how discovery works and what some of its weak points are.
Of course, the organization and clarity of your writing will also affect your grade.

Categories
Legal Issues

I can get a 48-hour extension, i am from australia.

The task is attached, which requires 1500 words and simple math—completely swamped with work and another assignment. I can get a 48-hour extension, I am from Australia. thanks heaps for any help

Categories
Legal Issues

Spell/grammar check your work.

Instructions: To earn credit, submit an original paper that meets the following requirements to the Turnitin link before September 18 at 11:59 p.m. (PST) Develop a formal research paper analyzing one civil rights law that affects the operations of an HRT agency or organization. Focus on one HRT industry and setting: Hospitality/tourism (hotel, restaurant, cruise line, airline or casino), recreation (park, sport, aquatics, day camp, military or campus recreation program) or recreation therapy program (medical, city, school or prison). Content: Provide information needed for new management trainees in one HRT industry/setting about the meaning of social justice and civil rights, one civil rights law and how it applies to the selected agency or organization (facilities, programs, guests, staff and others). Clearly identify the HRT industry/setting/type of agency or organization and the specific name of one researched civil rights law. Discuss proactive actions that managers and staff can take to comply with the law, protect the civil rights of individuals and effectively manage the organization. References: Evaluate and analyze information obtained from a minimum of two (2) current and credible sources. The references should be directly related to your selected HRT setting and the law you are writing about. Credible references: -Course textbook and other books. -Full-text peer-reviewed journal articles. -Trade or industry publication articles (published to educate and inform professionals working in a trade or industry). -Articles, data, legal requirements or analysis from governmental web pages (.gov), educational web pages (.edu). -Conference proceeding articles. -Dissertations/theses. Use only the type of references listed. All references must be published or revised between 2006-2022 and include the name of the author/editor/organization. Do NOT use magazine articles (designed for the public), blogs, encyclopedias, dictionaries, Wikipedia, magazines, book reviews, abstracts, videos, or newspaper articles as references. Do not use any reference without a current date (n.d. is not acceptable). The copyright date for a website is usually at the bottom of the page. Format Write a formal paper. Use third person (no I, we or you). For example: According to researchers (Smith, 2017), one civil right law that is important for hotel managers to know about is . . . Write a minimum of 1,500 words, including the introduction, body and conclusion. An abstract, title page, running head, and table of contents should not be included and will not count toward the required length. Double-space throughout the paper and reference section. Use a 12-point readable font. Use headings to organize the paper. Indent the first line of each paragraph. Limit paragraphs to 4-7 sentences in length. Spell/grammar check your work. Include APA format citations throughout the text of the paper (author’s last name, year of publication) and full APA citations in the reference section at the end of the paper. Do not use any direct quotes, lists or bullet points in the paper. Write full sentences in paragraph form. Use appropriate grammar, spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. Submitting Your Paper and the Similarity Report: Upload your work in Word or PDF format to the Turnitin link. The Similarity Report should be 14% or less, including citations. Do not copy and paste any material written by another author or written by you for a previous assignment or class. Submit your paper several hours or days before the deadline, so you have time to check the Similarity Report and make revisions if necessary. Grading Grading for the assignment will be based on content, adherence to the assignment requirements, quality of the writing, format, references, citations, and originality.

Categories
Legal Issues

350-500 word APA style essay with at least one citeable source on: Analyze how e

350-500 word APA style essay with at least one citeable source on: Analyze how early laws in America contributed to the legitimacy of intimate partner violence.

Categories
Legal Issues

A​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ssessment 2: Essay Weighting: 50% of the total grade for

A​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ssessment 2: Essay
Weighting: 50% of the total grade for this course
Due date: Week 9
Rationale
Dealing with competing problems is a common experience when working with consumers. What they want and what they might need can raise dilemmas for the health worker. Understanding and meeting a client’s rights may conflict with legal and ethical requirements.
The ability to understand a dilemma and decide on strategies needs to be considered in light of legal requirements, ethical standards, and policies. There are consequences for failing to fulfil duty of care, conform to legislation requirements, and for not addressing actual and potential situations that put the client at risk. Understanding these concepts means the health worker can make a conscious and professionally sound choice about what steps to take.
The use of an essay demonstrates that you are able to analyse and synthesise scholarly information in relation to a scenario.
Assessment description
You will write a 2000-word formal, academic essay based on the work you have done in the course to this point.
You will explain and describe the legal and ethical considerations related to a scenario in Aged Care. You will need to draw on the relevant legislation, case law, and literature to support your response. You must refer to specific aspects of the scenario to exemplify your argument.
Your essay must include references to appropriate academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journal article, academic books) to support your assertions. The quality as well as the quantity of sources will be taken into consideration. You must use the UniSA Harvard Referencing system for in-text referen​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ces and your reference list for ALL material which are not your own. This includes academic references, quality primary sources e.g. Government websites, images apart from your own, and online articles.
When considering references for your answers, you may use the course readings, but are also expected to research information more widely and refer to additional literature. Remember that in many instances the online resources provided in the weekly materials, are for teaching and illustrative purposes, so it is expected that you use scholarly publications for your assessments rather than reference these sources.
The assessment will require you to discuss the implication of working in a highly regulated and dynamic environment and the implications of ethical decision making for community health. You will also need to describe scope of practice for community health workers.
Scenario
You are a health care worker, employed by a health care provider, to provide home care support to Kenneth who is 84 years old, and lives with his son. While providing home care support you witness Kenneth being attacked by his son. Kenneth was hit in the chest, causing him to fall back into his chair, then hit over the ear, before his son picked up a magazine and threw it violently onto Kenneth’s lap. When you went to Kenneth, you saw red marks and on his chest, old bruises. Kenneth says that he doesn’t want you to report what has happened. Kenneth has no mental impairment nor does he suffer confusion.
NOTE: Referencing is only worth 10% of your grade but inadequate referencing can be a breach of academic integrity and lead to an academic integrity review of your asse​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ssment.

Categories
Legal Issues

P​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​olicy Arguments The assignment scenario is found in your

P​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​olicy Arguments
The assignment scenario is found in your online teachinglaw.com textbook. Read the scenario and the statutes provided. Your assignment is to publish three policy arguments for allowing the billboards and three policy arguments for disallowing the billboards.
This is the final writing assignment​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ for the course so treat it like a final exam. Give it your best preparation, effort, and attention to detail.
Download the directions and grading rubric.
Download the template and use the sample format provided.
all files attached. please carefully review and let me know if you have any questions. thanks​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.

Categories
Legal Issues

A​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​fter reading the Brittany Maynard case, create an origina

A​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​fter reading the Brittany Maynard case, create an original post that compares your professional and personal positions on the case. What are the code of ethics, professional regulations, and policies that support your professional position? Explain how to work through ideas when your professional and personal positions come into conflict.
I have to respond to at least two of my peers. I will send what was posted later because there are no posts yet. In response to them, you should suggest codes of ethics, professional regulations, or policies that contradict the position proposed ​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​in their post. You will read Brittany Manard’s case. Title: More States Considering Right to Die Laws After Brittany Maynard. Author: John Sanburn Source: Time.Com 1/23/2015
Please Reference Medical Law and Ethics, Chapters 12 Ethical Issues Relating to Life and 13 Death and Dying
Chapter 12 guiding questions:
What are ethical considerations in healthcare related to life?
What are some rare genetic diseases?
Chapter 13 guiding questions:
What are ethical considerations in healthcare related to death and dying?
What is dignity, in relation to providing medical care with death​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​?

Categories
Legal Issues

H​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​i, this is my final project which includes the previous M

H​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​i, this is my final project which includes the previous Milestones One and Two. The section that needs to be completed on the rubric is the Recommendation/Conclusion section. Recommendations: In this section, you will utilize the knowledge you gained from your malpractice and ethical analyses to recommend and defend
strategies that would help improve medical practices and avoid future liability.
A. Recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future.
B. Defend how your recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and providing a safe, quality
healthcare experience for the patient. I will upload the rubric along with the final project paper which you will add the Conclusion/Recommendation section. Also, I highlighted two sections of the paper that needs to be condensed and revised per my professor’s feedback. Here’s what needs to be done in the sections.
Medical Practice Legal Components Section: This case actually doesn’t involve res ipsa. Res ipsa is a very complex legal doctrine that actually only applies in a limited number of cases. You’ve also somewhat misdescribed res ipsa as “the common law of tort.” Res ipsa is a common law argument but is not the entirety of the common law. I’ll leave it at this: res ipsa doesn’t apply here because it is really, really complicated! (Most first year law students don’t get it, either, so don’t worry!)
In any case, after that, you begin your analysis of the four elements of negligence which is correct! Those four ele​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ments — duty, breach, causation, and harm — are the legal components of a negligence case.
Duty refers to a relationship. That is, was there a relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant such that the defendant should have taken care of, or avoided harm to, the plaintiff. Here, that’s satisfied by virtue of the doctor-patient relationship.
In the Cultural Backgroud Section, the first part of this paragraph is a little vague and it is unclear how it specifically applies to this case. But, the second half gets stronger when you discuss communication. Focus on communication because there’s evidence of the role of communication in this case. Elaborate on this a bit using the literature. Why is this communication barrier a problem? Was Arturo provided an interpreter? Should he have been?
The Accountability Section can be condensed considerably (and save some space). You just need the verdict, damages, and apportionment of blame. It could be done in about two sentences! Overall everything is good but there’s a very tight page limit on the final project. You’ll need to do some condensing to fit within that limit. Work on reducing unnecessary information and reducing any wordiness. It is a tough task, but it is part of the challenge of the assignment! The total pages of the Final Project right now is 9 but can be condensed to 7. So to sum it will add the Conclusion/Recommendation Section on one page and revise and condense the highlighted sections on the uploaded paper. Also, add the reference page. I will also upload Milestone One and Two so you can do this. Thanks​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.